Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Chelsea Fontenel vs Ellie Daniels Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fontenel vs Daniels analysis and find out who is favored!
Chelsea Fontenel vs Ellie Daniels Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fontenel 1 - 0 Daniels
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fontenel has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Daniels has won 43.81%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fontenel, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Daniels has won 55.91%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 39.9% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fontenel has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Daniels has saved 52.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fontenel has won 45.83% of matches played (W/L 11/ 13), with Daniels winning 50% (W/L 5/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fontenel has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5). Daniels has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 7/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 7/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Fontenel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.83% of matches (W/L 11/ 13), where as Daniels has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 3/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fontenel winning 1 times and Daniels being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Fontenel winning 2 and Daniels winning 1. The last match between Fontenel and Daniels was at the W25 Edmonton, 30-10-2023, Q3, I.hard with Chelsea Fontenel getting the victory 7-6(7) 4-6 10-7.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:51:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fontenel and Daniels have played a deciding set 1 times, with Fontenel winning 1 times and Daniels 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Fontenel winning 1, and Daniels 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fontenel has played against opponents with an average rank of 236.46 while Daniels has played against players with an average rank of 183.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fontenel has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Daniels has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fontenel has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Daniels has converted 42.55% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
780
Rank
752
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
47% (27-30)
Career Total W/L
41% (7-10)
100% (1-0)
YTD W/L
60% (3-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Chelsea Fontenel vs Ellie Daniels For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Fontenel VS Daniels
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Chelsea Fontenel | Ellie Daniels |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 21 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:0 | 1:51:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (52/80) | 58% (48/83) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (35/52) | 71% (34/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 32% (9/28) | 40% (14/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (4/4) | 71% (5/7) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (35/83) | 45% (36/80) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(7) 4-6 10-7 |
Stats 
Chelsea Fontenel
Player
Ellie Daniels
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Chelsea Fontenel | Ellie Daniels |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 100% (1/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 58% (7/5) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (16/13) | 53% (60/54) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.32 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 18 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.36 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 20 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:23:48 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 226 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 66% (208/313) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 61% (126/208) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (46/105) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 43% (20/47) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (148/320) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 60% (3/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (2/0) |
Chelsea Fontenel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Weronika Baszak
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
62%
(
16 of
26)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
36
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ayumi Miyamoto
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Katarina Jokic
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
1
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
85
Total Points Won
64
|
6-0 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chelsea Fontenel
Player
Louise Kwong
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasmine Kabbaj
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
70%
(
64 of
92)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
1
Aces
4
13
Double Faults
4
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
48%
(
44 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chelsea Fontenel
Player
Ellie Daniels
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(7) 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jade Otway
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexandra Vecic
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
81%
(
59 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ellie Daniels Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Dasha Ivanova
Player
Ellie Daniels
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
50 of
91)
102
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ellie Daniels
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ellie Daniels
Player
Anna Tabunshchyk
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
52%
(
45 of
87)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
51%
(
44 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 5-7 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ellie Daniels
Player
Tereza Susen
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
4 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dasha Ivanova
Player
Ellie Daniels
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Allura Zamarripa
Player
Ellie Daniels
42%
(
25 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ellie Daniels
Player
Mana Ayukawa
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
0
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chelsea Fontenel
Player
Ellie Daniels
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(7) 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ellie Daniels
Player
Louise Kwong
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kira Pavlova
Player
Ellie Daniels
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
49%
(
33 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Fontenel Vs Daniels Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Fontenel are available here and Daniels photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
